Go directly to the content here!
 

Eurecnet - Literature: Norway

Literature: Norway

NEM has published a number of guidelines, but they are only available in Norwegian.

The Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees have worked out a Research Ethics Library in cooperation with the universities in Norway: https://www.etikkom.no/en/library/. It is meant as an educational resource for research institutions as well as for members of research ethics committees.


Karlsen, Jan Reinert; Solbakk, Jan Helge; Holm, Søren. Ethical Endgames: Broad Consent for Narrow Interests; Open Consent for Closed Minds. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011; Volume 20.(4) pp. 572-583.

Solbakk, Jan Helge. In the ruins of Babel: Pitfalls on the way towards a universal language for research ethics and benefit sharing. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2011; Volume 20.(3) pp. 341-355.

Ruyter KW, Louk K, Jorqui M, Kvalheim V, Cekanauskaite A, Townend D. From research exemption to research norm: Recognising an alternative to consent for large scale biobank research. Medical Law International 2010: 10: 287-313.

Ruyter, Knut W (2009). Rhetorical Speech and Argumentation in the Public Debate on Stem Cell Research: An Inclusive or a Sorting Society?, In Judit Sándor (ed.), Perfect Copy? Law and Ethics of Reproductive Medicine. Center for Ethics and Law in Biomedicine. ISBN 978-963-9776-75-3. pp. 53-70.

Guillemin, Marilys & Heggen, Kristin (2009). Rapport and respect: negotiating ethical relations between researcher and participant. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. ISSN 1386-7423. 12(3), pp. 291-299. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9165-8

Ursin, Lars Øystein; Solberg, Berge. The Health dugnad: Biobank participation and the solidary pursuit of the common good. I: The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Springer 2009. ISBN 978-0-387-93871-4. pp. 219-236 NTNU.

Solbakk, JH, Holm, S, Hofmann, B (Eds.), The ethics of research biobanking, Springer Verlag, September 2009, 366 pp.

Hem, Marit Helene; Heggen, Kristin & Ruyter, Knut W (2008). Creating trust in an acute psychiatric ward. Nursing Ethics. ISSN 0969-7330. 15(6), pp. 777-788. doi: 10.1177/0969733008090525

Hem, Marit Helene; Heggen, Kristin & Ruyter, Knut W (2007). Questionable Requirement for Consent in Observational Research in Psychiatry. Nursing Ethics. ISSN 0969-7330. 14(1), pp. 41-53. doi: 10.1177/0969733007071357

Ruyter, Knut W (2006). Should members of ethics committee be trained and certified in ethics? Experiences and teaching programs. Acta medica Lituanica. ISSN 1392-0138. 13(1), pp. 6-11.

Skolbekken, John-Arne; Ursin, Lars Øystein; Solberg, Berge; Ytterhus, Borgunn; Christensen, Erik. Not worth the paper it's written on? Informed consent and biobank research in a Norwegian context. Critical Public Health 2005; Volume 15.(4) pp. 335-347 NTNU.


<- Literature

Contact: eurec@eurecnet.org